Equipment Type

Smarter Excavators Toughen Up

Power, durability and extended service intervals ride the wave of technology that has carried excavators to the level that they can think for you

April 01, 2004

 

John Deere
The computer in John Deere's C Series excavators automatically adjusts hydraulic-flow priority for swing, boom, and stick functions to meet changing work demands. But like most recent excavator upgrades, the C-Series also brought more powerful engines and improved cooling systems.
Data Logger
Information from an excavator's data logger can be graphed to guide operating decisions or maintenance planning. For example, too much idle time may mean you need another truck on the job, or a lot of travel time may hint at fast undercarriage wear.

Don't Mess with Tip Radius

 

Changing Buckets

When changing buckets or buying quick couplers, remember that very small differences in tip radius—measured from the rear bucket pins to the tip of the teeth—alter an excavator's penetrating force. For example, on a 73,000-pound machine, a bucket that measures 65 inches from the pin to the tooth develops about 39,000 pounds of force. It will deliver only about 35,000 pounds of force (a loss of 10 percent) if the tip radius is extended to 72 inches.

 

 

 

 


 

Computers installed in today's 30- to 40-ton hydraulic excavators have taken a crucial step up to a level of sophistication that they can actually make production decisions, but innovations in this product category are not all electronic. Equipment manufacturers have also made impressive improvements the old-fashioned way—investing research and development dollars into more powerful engines and hydraulics, more effective cooling systems, longer-lasting linkages and longer service intervals.

The Environmental Protection Agency's 2003 Tier-II emissions deadline brought engine updates across the 30- to 40-ton excavator class. With their electronic fuel-injection controls, virtually all of the engines are more powerful than engines used in preceding models (up to 19 percent more horsepower). And with the ability to fine-tune fuel injection as the work changes, most of the new engines use in the neighborhood of 10 percent less fuel.

Combine electronic engine controls with second- and third-generation computers on hydraulic systems, and the latest generation of excavators are so smart that they're behaving like production advisors on the job. For example, machine controllers offer operators the choice of multiple work modes, each designed to assign hydraulic priority to the circuits most critical to production in common excavator jobs—stick and boom get flow priority, for example, in the digging mode; and the attachment circuit gets priority in attachment mode. The problem with previous generations of excavators is that operators had to be trained to use the right mode at the right time. That seldom happened, and productivity and efficiency suffered when work was done in the wrong modes.

To simplify the choices, many of today's machines offer an Automatic mode. The machine's computer senses system pressure and the operator's lever inputs, then adjusts hydraulic priorities automatically to accomplish more efficiently what the operator wants to do.

Caterpillar has eliminated work-mode selections from its 325C L and 330C L. Most other manufacturers have limited the choices to Automatic mode and one or two other choices (often just Digging and Attachment modes). But a few manufacturers, such as Komatsu and Hyundai, continue to offer a range of manually selected work modes. Komatsu's Galeo system has Active and Economy work modes, a Lifting mode, and a Breaker mode. Plus two boom settings—Smooth and Power—allow operators to customize each work mode. Hyundai offers a similar control scheme, with Heavy Duty and General settings, plus a Breaker mode. And the operator can choose High Power or Standard Power in each mode.

Sensors in the hydraulic systems integrated with controllers on both the hydraulic pumps and engines have made the power-boost feature common. If the machine's working circuits reach standard relief pressure for more than a second or two in tough digging, the systems automatically boost main pressure about 10 percent for a short period (usually around 10 seconds). Machines can handle the heavier load for short spurts, and the extra power can help push through a tough job. Several manufacturers put a button on the joystick that operators can push to boost power on demand.

Some excavators are also sporting the first real data loggers that manufacturers have installed on machines. Deere and Hitachi's Machine Information Center, for example, records all operating parameters—things such as engine speed, coolant temperature, hydraulic pressure and temperature, travel time, swing time, idle time, fault codes, alarms and more. That data can be downloaded easily with a hand-held computer. Once it is uploaded to a personal computer, it can be graphed for easy analysis.

"You can look at what your excavator's been doing for a month," says John Deere's Mark Wall, excavator product manager. "If there's a lot of idle time, you may decide you need another truck on the job. You can pull pump histograms to see how hard pumps have worked. If they've averaged 2,500 psi instead of 4,000 psi for the last 9,000 hours, you may decide not to overhaul them before sending that machine out to a big job."

Technology is improving durability and ease of service, too. For example, today's engines in the 30- to 40-ton excavator class have more heat to dissipate because of intercoolers between turbocharger and cylinder head, so many machines are now cooled by a fan with hydrostatic drive. Responding to information from a thermostat, the engine controller tells the hydrostatic fan drive when to come on and how fast to run. The fan uses only enough power to hold the engine in a safe operating-temperature range. Deere and some others have added an airfoil fan to variable fan drive to save significant horsepower.

It's not a coincidence that there's a service-interval race going on in hydraulic excavators at the same time so much electronic technology is being applied to the machines. Most of the diesel engines in today's excavators are designed for 500-hour oil-change intervals. The engines are working harder than ever, but computer controls have softened the sharp peaks in horsepower demand and they monitor and respond to coolant and oil temperatures and pressures better. New filter technologies are buying time for oil, too.

In the interest of aligning basic service at the same interval as the engine-oil change, manufacturers are applying special metallurgy and seals to bushings and pins in boom, stick and bucket joints to stretch greasing intervals. John Deere and Komatsu excavators are at 500 hours, and all the front-linkage pins except for the bucket joints on Cat and Case machines now require grease only at 1,000-hour intervals.

High-end hydraulic filtration, and more-effective cooling have extended hydraulic-oil service intervals as long as 4,000 hours. For example, Link-Belt's LX Series machines come standard with a factory-installed bypass filtration system called Nephron.

Other iron innovations include Komatsu's importing the minimum-tail-swing concept to the 30- to 40-ton size range last year. The PC308USLC-3 maintains its balance with an 18,000-pound counterweight and slightly extended track gauge. With a loaded bucket, it can turn 360 degrees within 17½ feet.

When you ask manufacturers' excavator product managers which single technology had the greatest impact on their product category over the past 24 months, virtually all of them talk about electronic controls that now do more than just sense conditions. They provide feedback—either at the monitor, or in the form of adjustments to hydraulic and engine performance. It's a sophistication bordering on artificial intelligence that makes the machines more effective and efficient. Electronic systems provide information that improves diagnostic ability and helps owners make the best choices about how to use the machine effectively.

Electronics warrant a lot of attention because they are beginning to automate mainstream production machines. The good news for buyers who have to make a living with the machines long after the "gee-whiz" has worn off is that today's innovations are not all gee-whiz. The same high-tech that makes this excavator class smarter and more productive is also making the machines more durable and easier to service.

Average Excavator Costs
Size range List price Hourly cost*
* Monthly ownership cost (based on list price) plus operating expenses, divided by 176 hours
Source: EquipmentWatch.com, phone (800) 669-3282
61,800 to 72,600 lbs. $256,831 $78
72,601 to 88,000 lbs. $303,011 $90

Excavator Specs: 30- to 40-Ton Base Models
Model Operating Weight (lbs.) Horsepower Max. Dig Depth Lift Cap. (lbs.)* Arm Digging Force (lbs.)
* Over the end, at 20-foot radius, at ground level
These excavators weigh 30 to 40 tons with standard equipment and a stick that's 10 to 11 feet long (performance is measured with that stick). Volvo reports the EC330B LC has the greatest lifting capacity in this size class, but Volvo measures lifting capacity for a machine without the bucket. Most manufacturers leave the bucket on the machine for these tests, which reduces their lifting capacity in the neighborhood of 2,500 pounds compared to a machine with no bucket. Specifications are based on information provided by manufacturers and by Spec Check (www.SpecCheck.com). Specifications are given for comparison only and are subject to change.
John Deere 270C LC 62,674 177 23′ 10″ 20,643 26,067
Komatsu PC270LC-7 62,830 179 21′ 2″ 22,000 33,290
Hitachi Zaxis 270LC 62,870 173 23′ 9″ 20,700 26,000
Liebherr R934B 62,920 194 23′ 5″ 19,750 27,500
Caterpillar 325C L 63,100 188 23′ 3″ 21,150 26,200
Volvo EC290B LC 64,230 192 24′ 0″ 24,270 30,340
Link-Belt 290LX 64,400 177 23′ 5″ 21,910 25,850
Case CX290 64,725 182 23′ 5″ 21,916 28,101
Daewoo Solar 300LC-V 65,270 197 24′ 1″ 22,200 29,500
Hyundai R290LC-7 66,270 183 24′ 7″ 21,050 30,310
Hyundai R320LC-7 71,000 259 23′ 4″ 24,820 32,470
Komatsu PC308USLC-3 72,066 179 21′ 0″ 23,400 30,640
JCB JS330 72,098 219 24′ 3″ 22,248 29,547
John Deere 330C LC 72,492 246 23′ 11″ 26,089 37,396
Hitachi Zaxis 330LC 73,500 247 24′ 3″ 25,800 37,000
Komatsu PC300LC-7 73,629 242 24′ 3″ 26,400 37,040
Volvo EC330B LC 73,740 247 24′ 2″ 29,620 38,810
Daewoo Solar 340LC-V 74,700 247 25′ 2″ 26,310 38,400
Liebherr R944B 77,000 241 24′ 5″ 26,500 31,680
Caterpillar 330C L 77,113 247 24′ 3″ 26,950 36,300
Link-Belt 330LX 78,000 247 24′ 1″ 28,890 36,850
Case CX330 78,043 259 24′ 1″ 28,925 36,846
Hyundai R360LC-7 79,590 280 24′ 7″ 28,510 37,280


Web Resources
Case
www.casece.com
Caterpillar
www.cat.com
Daewoo
www.dhiac.com
Hitachi
www.hitachiconstruction.com
Hyundai
www.hceusa.com
JCB
www.jcbna.com
John Deere
www.deere.com
Komatsu
www.komatsuamerica.com
Link-Belt
www.lbxco.com
Liebherr
www.liebherr.com
Volvo
www.volvo.com/constructionequipment

GET FREE PRICE QUOTES

More like this

Comments on: "Smarter Excavators Toughen Up"

Overlay Init