Equipment Type

Aid, Don’t Replace, Safety Sense

Automated safety devices are one solution for equipment-related deaths, specifically those designed to prevent blind-spot accidents.
July 30, 2014

Rod Sutton is editorial director of Construction Equipment magazine. He is in charge of editorial strategy and writes a monthly column for the magazine, The Sutton Report. He has more than 30 years in construction journalism, and has been with Construction Equipment since 2001.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly half (443) of the fatal workplace injuries at road-construction sites from 2003 to 2010 involved vehicles or construction equipment. Of those people killed, one-quarter died after being struck by a machine that was backing up.

Those numbers represent only one segment of construction activity. They don’t include accidents involving equipment at mines, aggregate plants, demolition operations, or excavations.

Automated safety devices are one solution for equipment-related deaths, specifically those designed to prevent blind-spot accidents. Backup cameras are appearing on construction equipment, and proximity alerts are available, too.

I rented a car that not only had a backup camera with audible alarm to warn me against obstacles behind, but also indicator lights on each sideview mirror to warn against obstacles alongside. System designers use technology in ingenious ways, for the safety of workers in and around machines. But they cannot replace the human element.

My brother nailed it. An avid Harley rider, he was T-boned by an inattentive automobile driver several years ago. He still rides, but his injury rides with him. I mentioned these sensors on cars, and he launched into a tirade against them. He—and the riding community, by and large—is against anything that makes a driver even less attentive than they already are. He believes drivers will rely on the audible alerts or “intelligent braking” instead of staying alert to the motorcycles in their midst.

Equipment operators can easily lull themselves into a similar sense of false security. Site workers have; they routinely ignore the sound of backup alarms.

As technology improves safety through automated warning systems, we cannot allow machine operators to become lax in the safety habits they already have. As I backed my rental car into its parking space, I glanced at the camera image, listened for alerts, but still used my sideview mirrors as I maneuvered.

Automated safety systems can and should augment the safety sense within the cabs, but it must not replace it.

Add comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Evaluations

Gehl V420 skid steer features low-profile lift arms that provide enhanced visibility for the operator.
Power, stability, pilot hydraulics, smooth ride, and operator...
Night milling is commonplace on large Interstate jobs
Though down to four OEMs in the game, the technology stakes—including...
Ford F-150 SuperCab was quiet and comfortable.
Fuel economy is attractive, but carrying or pulling heavy loads is a...
CE-Safety & Security
Overlay Init